CANLI
Yükleniyor Veriler getiriliyor…
/ Makaleler / Scopus Detay
Scopus 🔓 Açık Erişim YÖKSİS Eşleşti

Comparison of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score: A prospective study

Turkish Neurosurgery · Ocak 2019

YÖKSİS DOI Eşleşmesi Bulundu

Bu Scopus makalesi YÖKSİS veritabanında da kayıtlı. Aşağıda YÖKSİS verilerini görebilirsiniz.

YÖKSİS Kayıtları
Comparison of glasgow coma scale and full outline of unresponsiveness (four) score: a prospective study
Turkish Neurosurgery · 2019 SCI-Expanded
DOÇENT MERT ŞAHİNOĞLU →
Comparison of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline ofUnresponsiveness (Four) Score: A Prospective Study
Turkish Neurosurgery · 2019 SCI-Expanded
PROFESÖR FARUK ÇİÇEKCİ →
Comparison of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline ofUnresponsiveness (Four) Score: A Prospective Study
Turkish Neurosurgery · 2018 SCI-Expanded
PROFESÖR FARUK ÇİÇEKCİ →
Comparison of glasgow coma scale and full outline of unresponsiveness (four) score: a prospective study
Turkish Neurosurgery · 2019 SCI-Expanded
DOÇENT MERT ŞAHİNOĞLU →
Comparison of glasgow coma scale and full outline of unresponsiveness (four) score: a prospective study
Turkish Neurosurgery · 2019 SCI-Expanded
PROFESÖR JALE BENGİ ÇELİK →
Comparison of glasgow coma scale and full outline of unresponsiveness (four) score: a prospective study
Turkish Neurosurgery · 2019 SCI-Expanded
PROFESÖR İNCİ KARA →
Comparison of glasgow coma scale and full outline of unresponsiveness (four) score: a prospective study
Turkish Neurosurgery · 2019 SCI-Expanded
PROFESÖR İNCİ KARA →
Comparison of glasgow coma scale and full outline of unresponsiveness (four) score: a prospective study
Turkish Neurosurgery · 2019 SCI-Expanded
DOKTOR ÖĞRETİM ÜYESİ YEŞİM ŞERİFE BAYRAKTAR →

Makale Bilgileri

DergiTurkish Neurosurgery
Yayın TarihiOcak 2019
Cilt / Sayfa29 · 285-288
Erişim🔓 Açık Erişim
Özet AIM: To assess reliability by comparing the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) scores and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) values assigned by specialists from two different fields to patients in the Anesthesiology and Reanimation and Neurosurgery intensive care units. MATERIAL and METHODS: This study was conducted between March 2017 and June 2017 at Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine, Departments of Anesthesiology and Reanimation and Neurosurgery. Seventy-nine patients aged 18-65 years who were treated for at least 24 hours in the intensive care unit were independently assessed by two raters, an anesthesiologist and a neurosurgeon,using FOUR and GCS. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test was applied for continuous variables, and SPSS 20.0 version software was used for data analyses. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between FOUR scores and GCS values given by the two raters. The mortality rate among patients with low scores on both FOUR and GCS was higher than the hospital mortality rate. CONCLUSION: Considering that FOUR score allows a more detailed neurological evaluation than GCS, and our findings suggest that FOUR score is more useful for patients who are unconscious or dependent on mechanical ventilation.

Yazarlar (7)

1
Yesim Serife Bayraktar
ORCID: 0000-0001-5156-7064
2
Mert Sahinoglu
ORCID: 0000-0003-0633-8304
3
Faruk Cicekci
4
Inci Kara
5
Hakan Karabagli
6
Ates Duman
7
Jale Çelik

Anahtar Kelimeler

Consciousness FOUR Full outline of unresponsiveness GCS Glasgow coma scale

Kurumlar

Selçuk Üniversitesi
Selçuklu Turkey

Metrikler

13
Atıf
7
Yazar
5
Anahtar Kelime

Sistemimizdeki Yazarlar