Scopus
🔓 Açık Erişim YÖKSİS Eşleşti
A comparative randomized trial of intubation success in difficult intubation cases: The use of a Frova intubation catheter versus a Bonfils intubation fiberoscope
Wideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne · Ocak 2019
YÖKSİS Kayıtları
A comparative randomized trial of intubation success in difficult intubation cases: the use of a Frova intubation catheter versus a Bonfils intubation fiberoscope
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques · 2019 Scopus
PROFESÖR JALE BENGİ ÇELİK →
A comparative randomized trial of intubation success in difficult intubation cases: the use of a Frova intubation catheter versus a Bonfils intubation fiberoscope
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques · 2019 Scopus
DOÇENT EMİNE ASLANLAR →
Makale Bilgileri
DergiWideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne
Yayın TarihiOcak 2019
Cilt / Sayfa14 · 486-494
Scopus ID2-s2.0-85078548014
Erişim🔓 Açık Erişim
Özet
Introduction: A difficult airway is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo surgical interventions. Therefore, many devices and algorithms have been developed for the management of a difficult airway. However no study has been conducted comparing Frova catheter (FC) and a Bonfils fiberoscope (BF) to date. Aim: To compare the effectiveness and success of two devices, a FC and BF, in difficult intubation cases. Material and methods: Design: Single-centre randomized controlled trial in patients with difficult airways. The assignment order was created by unplanned number charts, and the assignment was hidden in closed covers, which were not unlocked until case permission had been provided. Setting: The trial was undertaken in a university hospital in Turkey. The primary analysis was based on 60 participants (n = 30, n = 30) with difficult intubation. The main outcomes were the success rates of placement of the tracheal tube in the trachea and the duration of the tracheal intubation process. Results: In the BF group, successful intubation was carried out in 25 of the 30 (83.3%) patients, whereas intubation was successful in 28 of the 30 patients (93.3%) in the FC group. Patients who could not be intubated with the first device were intubated with the other device. The mean duration of intubation was 109 (85–140) s in the BF group, whereas it was 38.8 (26–60) s in the FC group. Conclusions: Both devices were successful in difficult intubation cases. However, given the shorter duration of intubation using the FC and its lower cost as compared with that of the BF, the FC can be considered superior to the BF in difficult intubation cases.
Yazarlar (9)
1
Irem Gumus
2
Aysun Ozdemirkan
3
Faruk Cicekci
4
Mehmet Sari
5
Hasan Huseyin Bayram
ORCID: 0000-0003-3424-8613
6
Cansu Ciftci
7
Emine Aslanlar
8
Jale Çelik
9
Ozkan Onal
ORCID: 0000-0002-5574-1901
Anahtar Kelimeler
Bonfils
Catheters
Difficult airway
Endoscopes
Equipment and supplies
Frova
Intratracheal
Intubation
Kurumlar
Selçuk Üniversitesi
Selçuklu Turkey
Metrikler
5
Atıf
9
Yazar
8
Anahtar Kelime