Scopus
🔓 Açık Erişim YÖKSİS Eşleşti
Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition) · Ocak 2022
YÖKSİS Kayıtları
Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial
Brazilian journal of Anesthesiology · 2022 SCI-Expanded
PROFESÖR İBRAHİM ÖZKAN ÖNAL →
Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial.
Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) · 2021 SCI-Expanded
PROFESÖR İBRAHİM ÖZKAN ÖNAL →
Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology · 2022 SCI-Expanded
DOÇENT EMİNE ASLANLAR →
Makale Bilgileri
DergiBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition)
Yayın TarihiOcak 2022
Cilt / Sayfa72 · 55-62
Scopus ID2-s2.0-85120944041
Erişim🔓 Açık Erişim
Özet
Background: Several devices and algorithms have already been examined and compared for difficult airway management. However, there is no existing study comparing the success of the Intubating Catheter (IC) and the Videolaryngoscope (VL) in patients who are difficult to intubate. We aimed to compare Frova IC and McGrath VL in terms of intubation success rates in patients with difficult intubation. Methods: This prospective, randomized study was performed in an university hospital. Patients who underwent an operation under general anesthesia and whom airway management process was deemed difficult were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups by envelopes containing a number: the intubating catheter group (Group IC), intubated using the Frova IC, and the videolaryngoscope group (Group VL), intubated using the McGrath VL. Study data were collected by a technician who was blind to the study groups and the type of device used in the intubation procedure. Results: A total of 49 patients with difficult airway were included in the study, including 25 patients in the Frova IC Group and 24 patients in the McGrath VL Group. The rate of successful intubation was determined to be 88% in Group IC and 66% in Group VL (p = 0.074). The mean duration of intubation attempt in Group VL was 44.62 seconds, whereas in Group IC, it was 51.12 seconds (p = 0.593). Group VL was found to have a significantly lower Cormack-Lehane grade compared to Group IC (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Frova IC is a candidate to be an indispensable instrument in terms of cost-effectiveness in clinics such as anesthesia and emergency medicine, where difficult intubation cases are frequently encountered. However, the combination of Frova IC and McGrath VL seems to be more successful in difficult intubation situations, so future studies should focus on using these two devices together.
Yazarlar (8)
1
Aysun Ozdemirkan
2
Ozkan Onal
ORCID: 0000-0002-5574-1901
3
Irem Ozcan
4
Emine Aslanlar
5
Ali Ozgul Saltali
6
Mehmet Sari
7
Cansu Ciftci
8
Hasan Huseyin Bayram
ORCID: 0000-0003-3424-8613
Anahtar Kelimeler
Airway management
Catheters
Equipment and supplies
Intratracheal
Intubation
Kurumlar
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland United States
Selçuk Tip Fakültesi
Konya Turkey
Metrikler
6
Atıf
8
Yazar
5
Anahtar Kelime