CANLI
Yükleniyor Veriler getiriliyor…
/ Makaleler / Scopus Detay
Scopus YÖKSİS Eşleşti

In vitro antibacterial activities of root-canal sealers by using two different methods

Journal of Endodontics · Ocak 2004

YÖKSİS DOI Eşleşmesi Bulundu

Bu Scopus makalesi YÖKSİS veritabanında da kayıtlı. Aşağıda YÖKSİS verilerini görebilirsiniz.

YÖKSİS Kayıtları
In Vitro Antibacterial Activities of Root Canal Sealers By Using Two Different Methods
Journal of Endodontics · 2004 SCI-Expanded
PROFESÖR SEMA BELLİ →
In Vitro Antibacterial Activities of Root Canal Sealers By Using Two Different Methods
Journal of Endodontics · 2004 SSCI
PROFESÖR OSMAN ERGANİŞ →

Makale Bilgileri

DergiJournal of Endodontics
Yayın TarihiOcak 2004
Cilt / Sayfa30 · 57-60
Özet The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of five different root-canal sealers (RoekoSeal, Ketac-Endo, AH Plus, Sealapex, Sultan). With the use of Enterococcus faecalis as a test organism, both the agar-diffusion test (ADT) and direct-contact test (DCT) were performed. For DCT, sealers were mixed and placed on the sidewall of microtiter plate wells. A 10-μl bacterial suspension was placed on the tested material samples. Bacteria were allowed to directly contact to the sealers for 1 h at 37°C. Bacterial growth was then spectrophotometrically measured through every 30 min for 19 h by using an Anthos Labtec HT 2. For ADT, a 200-μl bacterial suspension was spread on brain-heart infusion agar plates. Freshly mixed sealers were poured into uniform wells punched in the agar. After periods of incubation at 37°C for 24 h and 7 days in humid atmosphere, the zones of inhibition of bacterial growth on agar plates were observed and measured. Ketac-Endo, Sultan, and AH Plus had similar results for DCT. These sealers were more potent bacterial-growth inhibitors than Sealapex and RoekoSeal. According to ADT, RoekoSeal showed no antibacterial activity. There was no significant difference among AH Plus, Sealapex, and Sultan (p > 0.05). Ketac-Endo demonstrated lower antimicrobial activity than these sealers (p < 0.05). Time had no effect on the antibacterial activity of the tested sealers (p > 0.05). The antibacterial efficiency of the materials varied according to the tests used. It was concluded that the technique, time, and ingredients of the tested material can affect the results of the microbiological studies.

Yazarlar (5)

1
Funda Kont Cobankara
2
Halil Cenk Altinöz
3
O. Erganiş
4
K. Kav
5
Sema Belli

Kurumlar

Selçuk Üniversitesi
Selçuklu Turkey

Metrikler

82
Atıf
5
Yazar

Sistemimizdeki Yazarlar