Scopus
🔓 Açık Erişim YÖKSİS Eşleşti
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia · Ocak 2014
YÖKSİS Kayıtları
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia · 2014 SCI-Expanded
PROFESÖR ŞABAN GÖNÜL →
Makale Bilgileri
DergiArquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
Yayın TarihiOcak 2014
Cilt / Sayfa77 · 345-350
Scopus ID2-s2.0-84922008924
Erişim🔓 Açık Erişim
Özet
Purpose: To compare the results of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), Fourier domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT), and a Scheimpflug camera (SC), combined with Placido corneal topography. Methods: A total of 25 healthy subjects were enrolled in the present study, and one eye of each subject was included. A detailed ophthalmic examination was performed in all cases following CCT measurements with OLCR, FD-OCT, and SC. The results were compared using an ANOVA test. Bland-Altman analysis was used to demonstrate agreement between methods. Intra-examiner repeatability was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the results of the CCT measurements obtained using the three different devices (p=0.009). Significant correlations were found between OLCR and FD-OCT (r=0.97; p<0.0001), FD-OCT and SC (r=0.91; p<0.0001), and OLCR and SC (r=0.95; p<0.0001). The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) obtained from Bland-Altman plots were from -7.2 μm to 28.7 μm for OLCR versus FD-OCT, from -19.2 μm to 30.4 μm for OLCR versus SC, and from -42.6 to 32.3 μm for FD-OCT versus SC. Intra-examiner repeatability was excellent for each method, with ICCs >0.98. Conclusions: Although the results of CCT measurements obtained from these three devices were highly correlated with one another and the mean differences between instruments were comparable with the reported diurnal CCT fluctuation, the measurements are not directly interchangeable in clinical practice because of the wide LOA values.
Yazarlar (4)
1
Şaban Gönül
2
Bengu Ekinci Koktekir
3
Berker Bakbak
4
Şansal Gedik
Anahtar Kelimeler
Comparative study
Cornea/anatomy & histology
Corneal topography/methods
Fourier analysis
Observer variation
Tomography, optical coherence/methods
Kurumlar
Selçuk Tip Fakültesi
Konya Turkey
Metrikler
10
Atıf
4
Yazar
6
Anahtar Kelime