Scopus
YÖKSİS DOI Eşleşti
SJR Q2
Comparison of automated vs. manual measurement to estimate fetal weight in isolated polyhydramnios
Journal of Perinatal Medicine · Ağustos 2019
YÖKSİS Kayıtları
Comparison of automated vs. manual measurement to estimate fetal weight in isolated polyhydramnios
Journal of Perinatal Medicine · 2019 SCI
Prof. Dr. GÖKÇEN ÖRGÜL →
YÖKSİS Kayıtları — ISSN Eşleşmesi
Clinical analyses of 383 cases with maternal cardiac diseases
2017 ISSN: 0300-5577 SCI-Expanded
Prof. Dr. GÖKÇEN ÖRGÜL →
The effect of 50 GR oral glucose tolerance test on fetal celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery doppler parameters in healthy pregnancies
2023 ISSN: 0300-5577 SCI-Expanded Q3
Prof. Dr. GÖKÇEN ÖRGÜL →
Makale Bilgileri
ISSN03005577
Yayın TarihiAğustos 2019
Cilt / Sayfa47 · 592-597
Scopus ID2-s2.0-85067199367
Özet
To understand the impact of the measurement method to predict actual birthweight in pregnancies complicated with isolated polyhydramnios in the third trimester. A prospective study was conducted with 60 pregnant women between the 37th and 40th weeks of gestation. Routine biometric measurements were obtained by two-dimensional (2D) ultrasonography. When a satisfactory image was obtained, the image was frozen to get two measurements. First, calipers were placed to get the manual measurement. Then automated measurement was captured by the ultrasonography machine in the same image. The fetal weight was estimated by using the Hadlock II formula. The mean difference was found to be 0.03,-0.77,-0.02 and 0.17 for biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL), respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficient between automated and manual estimated fetal weights (EFWs) and the actual birthweight was 0.919 and 0.796, respectively. The mean difference between actual and manual EFW measurement values was 46.16 ± 363.81 g (range between-745 g and 685 g) (P = 0.330). Also, the mean difference between actual and automated EFW measurement values was found to be 31.98 ± 218.65 g (range between-378 g and 742 g) (P = 0.262). The Bland-Altman test results have shown that, 666 g lower or 759 g higher values were obtained when the measurement was performed manually. On the other hand, EFW results were 396 g lower or 460 g higher than the actual birthweight with automated measurement tools. The accuracy rate of fetal weight estimation with ultrasonography is high for both automated and manual measurements. Automated tools have a higher success to predict the EFW.
Yazarlar (6)
1
Hasan Eroğlu
ORCID: 0000-0002-1180-5299
2
Gökçen Örgül
ORCID: 0000-0003-0578-4230
3
Emine Avcl
4
Orhan Altlnboga
5
Gokhan Karakoc
ORCID: 0000-0003-3183-6129
6
Aykan Yücel
Anahtar Kelimeler
birth weight
fetal ultrasonography
fetal weight
Kurumlar
General Directorate of Public Health
Ankara Turkey
Training and Research Hospital
Ankara Turkey
Scimago Dergi (ISSN Eşleşmesi)
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Q2
SJR Skoru0,592
H-Index82
YayıncıWalter de Gruyter GmbH
ÜlkeGermany
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Q2)
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (Q2)
Metrikler
1
Atıf
6
Yazar
3
Anahtar Kelime