Scopus
YÖKSİS Eşleşti
Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments
International Endodontic Journal · Aralık 2016
YÖKSİS Kayıtları
Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments
International Endodontic Journal · 2015 SCI-Expanded
DOÇENT AHMET AKTI →
Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments
International Endodontic Journal · 2016 SCI-Expanded
DOÇENT AHMET AKTI →
Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments
International Endodontic Journal · 2016 SCI-Expanded
DOÇENT AHMET AKTI →
Makale Bilgileri
DergiInternational Endodontic Journal
Yayın TarihiAralık 2016
Cilt / Sayfa49 · 1183-1187
Scopus ID2-s2.0-84994460458
Özet
Aim: To assess the amount of debris extruded apically during root canal preparation using various nickel–titanium instrumentation systems. Methodology: Sixty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolar human teeth were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 15 teeth for each group). The canals were then instrumented with the following instrument systems: Vortex Blue (VB; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA), K3XF (SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA), Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany) and ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Apically extruded debris during instrumentation was collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. The Eppendorf tubes were then stored in an incubator at 70 °C for 5 days. The weight of the dry extruded debris was established by subtracting the pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation weight of the Eppendorf tubes for each group. The data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (anova) and Tukey's post hoc tests. Results: Vortex Blue and PTN files were associated with significantly less apically extruded debris than the K3XF and Reciproc files (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the VB and PTN files or between the K3XF and Reciproc files (P > 0.05). Conclusions: All instruments were associated with apical extrusion of debris. VB and PTN files were associated with less debris extrusion compared to the other systems.
Yazarlar (8)
1
H. S. Topçuoğlu
2
R. Zan
3
F. Akpek
4
G. Topçuoğlu
5
Ulusan
6
Ahmet Akti
ORCID: 0000-0002-3447-0065
7
S. Düzgün
8
M. Ağırnaslıgil
Anahtar Kelimeler
canal preparation
debris extrusion
K3XF
Vortex Blue
Kurumlar
Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
Sivas Turkey
Erciyes Üniversitesi
Kayseri Turkey
Metrikler
35
Atıf
8
Yazar
4
Anahtar Kelime