Scopus
🔓 Açık Erişim YÖKSİS Eşleşti
Artificial or Authentic? A Comparative Study of Article Titles Generated by Humans and AI in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Genel Tip Dergisi · Ağustos 2025
YÖKSİS Kayıtları
Artificial or Authentic? A Comparative Study of Article Titles Generated by Humans and AI in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Genel Tıp Dergisi · 2025 Scopus
DOKTOR ÖĞRETİM ÜYESİ LÜTFİYE PARLAK →
Artificial or Authentic? A Comparative Study of Article Titles Generated by Humans and AI in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Genel Tıp Derg. · 2025 TR DİZİN
DOÇENT ELİF BALEVİ BATUR →
Artificial or Authentic? A Comparative Study of Article Titles Generated by Humans and AI in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Genel Tıp Dergisi · 2025 TR DİZİN
DOKTOR ÖĞRETİM ÜYESİ EZGİ AKYILDIZ TEZCAN →
Makale Bilgileri
DergiGenel Tip Dergisi
Yayın TarihiAğustos 2025
Cilt / Sayfa35 · 775-781
Scopus ID2-s2.0-105016848720
Erişim🔓 Açık Erişim
Özet
Aim: To examine expert preferences and perceptions regarding whether article titles in the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation are generated by humans or artificial intelligence (AI), and to evaluate the selected titles in terms of scientific accuracy, comprehensibility, originality, and attractiveness. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two article titles published in a Q1 journal indexed in the Web of Science database were selected. For each, an alternative AI-generated title was created using the ChatGPT-4o model. A survey was administered to 15 academic participants with an H-index ≥3. For each title pair, participants indicated their preference and the reason for their choice. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 22.0 software. Results: A total of 480 title choices were recorded, with 58.1% favoring AI-generated titles. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.008). Overall, 93.3% of participants preferred AI titles more frequently. The most cited reason for preference was “comprehensibility” (47.3%). No statistically significant difference was found based on demographic variables. Conclusions: AI-generated titles were found to be strong in terms of clarity and attractiveness. However, “scientific accuracy” was cited more frequently in favor of original titles. This indicates that while AI is effective in generating appealing titles, human contribution remains necessary for ensuring scientific rigor. Hybrid models combining AI and human input may offer a balanced approach to scientific title generation.
Yazarlar (5)
1
Lütfiye Parlak
2
Funda Levendoglu
ORCID: 0000-0001-7248-6511
3
Elif Balevi Batur
ORCID: 0000-0001-8886-1144
4
Ezgi Akyildiz Tezcan
ORCID: 0000-0002-4988-1270
5
Ilknur Albayrak Gezer
Anahtar Kelimeler
Academic writing
artificial ıntelligence
physical medicine and rehabilitation
Kurumlar
Selçuk Tip Fakültesi
Konya Turkey