Scopus
🔓 Açık Erişim YÖKSİS DOI Eşleşti
SJR Q2
BEKTASHİ REFUTATİONS WRİTTEN AGAİNST THE TREATİSES OF HOCA ISHAK EFENDİ
Turk Kulturu Ve Haci Bektas Veli Arastirma Dergisi · Mart 2025
YÖKSİS Kayıtları
HOCA İSHAK EFENDİ’NİN RİSALELERİNE KARŞI YAZILAN BEKTAŞÎ REDDİYELERİ
Türk Kültürü ve Hacı Bektaş Veli Araştırma Dergisi · 2025 Scopus
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi SERAP TAŞTEKİN →
YÖKSİS Kayıtları — ISSN Eşleşmesi
Çorum Yöresi Alevi Kültüründe Geleneksel Bir Gelin Başlığı Aleyçin
2013 ISSN: 1306-8253 Art Index (Art Research Database, EBSCO)
Prof. Dr. EMİNE NAS →
Tokat Nebiköy Yöresel Kadın Erkek Giyiminde Üçleme Dört Kapı Kırk Makam ve On İki İmam Kavramları
2011 ISSN: 1306-8253 Art Index (Art Research Database, EBSCO)
Prof. Dr. EMİNE NAS →
Muhammed Beg Emânî in Şiilik İnancına Ait Manzumeleri
2014 ISSN: 1306-8253 Scopus
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi FATİH ERBAY →
Devletle İlişkileri Etrafında Bektaşilik: Doğuşu, Dönüşümü ve Krizi
2021 ISSN: 1306-8253 TR DİZİN
Prof. Dr. ALAATTİN AKÖZ →
OSMANLI-SAFEVÎ MÜCADELESİ SIRASINDA GÜNEY
AZERBAYCAN’DA BİR ŞEHİR: HOY/DÂRÜ’S-SEFÂ
(1728 TARİHLİ TAHRİR DEFTERİNE GÖRE)
2024 ISSN: 1306-8253 SCOPUS
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi DAVUT ŞAHBAZ →
Alaattin Aköz-Ahmet Kerim Demireğen, Muhyî’nin Selim-nâmesi, Palet
Yayınları Konya, 2020
2022 ISSN: 1306-8253 Scopus
Prof. Dr. DOĞAN YÖRÜK →
HOCA İSHAK EFENDİ’NİN RİSALELERİNE KARŞI YAZILAN BEKTAŞÎ REDDİYELERİ
2025 ISSN: 1306-8253 Scopus
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi SERAP TAŞTEKİN →
Makale Bilgileri
ISSN13068253
Yayın TarihiMart 2025
Scopus ID2-s2.0-105001823260
Erişim🔓 Açık Erişim
Özet
Refutation, which refers to the writing of works by members of a religion with the aim of refuting the inconsistencies of different sects of that religion or of another religion, has historically been a method of criticism and of proving that one’s own belief is correct, frequently used by Muslims, Christians and Jews. In Islamic history, just as in Christianity and Judaism, there are refutations written among sects to confirm their own views and refute the other. This approach of some Sunni scholars, who developed a reaction against the moderate atmosphere that emerged in the second half of the 19th century in favor of the Bektashis who were persecuted after the Janissary Corps was closed in the Ottoman Empire, sometimes went so far as to associate Bektashism with Hurufism. While Harputlu Hoca İshak Efendi wrote his views in response to the translation and publication of Cavidannâme, the fundamental source of Hurufism, in 1871, accusing Bektashis of being attached to this belief system, these views were rejected by Bektashis who did not want this moderate environment to be disrupted. In this study, Mehmet Ali Hilmi Dedebaba’s Kâşifu’l-Esrâr Reddiyesi, Ahmet Rıfat Efendi’s Miratu’lMekâsıd fı Defi’l-Mefâsid and Ahmet Rıfkı’s Bektashi Sırrı, which were written as a refutation from the Bektashi perspective to Hoca İshak Efendi’s Kâşifü’l Esrâr and Dâfi’u’l Eşrâr and İzahü’l Esrar treatises, were evaluated. Mehmet Ali Hilmi Dedebaba, Ahmet Rıfat and Ahmet Rıfkı have based their refutations on proving that Bektashism is not related to Hurufism, and have even developed many arguments that show that they are close to Sunnism. The common feature of the refutations, some of which are written in the form of questions and answers and some in the form of explanations, which show that Bektashism is not contrary to religion as well as social and cultural values, is that they have no connection with Hurufism, that there is no place for religious worship or attitudes in Bektashi lodges, and that Bektashis are not a religious, social or cultural threat.
Yazarlar (1)
1
Serap Taştekın
ORCID: 0000-0002-0854-8623
Anahtar Kelimeler
Bektashi Secret
Bektashism
Hoca İshak Efendi
Hurufism
Kâşifu’l-Esrâr
Refutation
Kurumlar
Selçuk Üniversitesi
Selçuklu Turkey
Scimago Dergi (ISSN Eşleşmesi)
Turk Kulturu ve Haci Bektas Veli - Arastirma Dergisi
Q2
OA
SJR Skoru0,203
H-Index9
YayıncıAnkara Haci Bayram Veli University
ÜlkeTurkey
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) (Q2)
Cultural Studies (Q2)