Scopus
🔓 Açık Erişim YÖKSİS Eşleşti
Comparison of double-port laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal suture technique and open surgical repair for Morgagni hernia
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences · Ocak 2024
YÖKSİS Kayıtları
Comparison of double-port laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal suturing repair technique and open surgical repair in Morgagni hernia
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences · 2024 SCI-Expanded
DOKTOR ÖĞRETİM ÜYESİ MEHMET SARIKAYA →
Comparison of double-port laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal suturing repair technique and open surgical repair in Morgagni hernia
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences · 2024 SCI-Expanded
PROFESÖR METİN GÜNDÜZ →
Comparison of double-port laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal suturing repair technique and open surgical repair in Morgagni hernia
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences · 2024 SCI-Expanded
PROFESÖR TAMER SEKMENLİ →
Comparison of double-port laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal suturing repair technique and open surgical repair in Morgagni hernia
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences · 2024 SCI-Expanded
DOÇENT FATMA ÖZCAN SIKI →
Makale Bilgileri
DergiTurkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Yayın TarihiOcak 2024
Cilt / Sayfa54 · 989-994
Scopus ID2-s2.0-85208164163
Erişim🔓 Açık Erişim
Özet
Background/aim: We aimed to compare the results of open surgery and double-port laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal suturing repair for the treatment of Morgagni hernia (MH). Materials and methods: Twenty-two patients with MH who were operated on in our clinic between January 2012 and January 2023 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique: open surgery (OS) (n = 14) or laparoscopic surgery (LS) (n = 8). Retrospective comparisons were made between the groups’ demographic information, surgical method used, defect size, operation time, length of hospital stay, costs, postoperative problems, and recurrence. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding sex, defect size, or costs. The mean age of the patients in the LS group (101 ± 68.3 months) was significantly higher than that of the OS group (23 ± 18.2 months) (p = 0.005). The operation time of the LS group (33.8 ± 3.6 min) was significantly shorter than that of the OS group (50.8 ± 6.5 min) (p < 0.01). Moreover, the LS group’s mean length of hospitalization (1.6 ± 0.9 days) was significantly lower than that of the OS group (2.8 ± 0.7 days) (p = 0.027). Conclusion: Double-port laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal suturing repair is a reliable technique preferred over open surgical repair due to its shorter operative time and hospital stay, ease of application, better cosmetic results, and no cost difference.
Yazarlar (5)
1
Mehmet Sarıkaya
ORCID: 0000-0003-2453-0893
2
Fatma Özcan Sıkı
ORCID: 0000-0002-4461-3461
3
Metin Gündüz
4
Tamer Sekmenli
5
Ilhan Çiftci
Anahtar Kelimeler
Congenital hernia
diaphragmatic hernia
laparoscopic
pediatric
Kurumlar
Selçuk Tip Fakültesi
Konya Turkey