Scopus
🔓 Açık Erişim YÖKSİS Eşleşti
Approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation use in acute respiratory failure
Tuberkuloz ve Toraks · Ocak 2015
YÖKSİS Kayıtları
Approach of pulmonologists in turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation use in acute respiratory failure
Tuberkuloz ve Toraks · 2015 TR DİZİN
PROFESÖR RECAİ ERGÜN →
Makale Bilgileri
DergiTuberkuloz ve Toraks
Yayın TarihiOcak 2015
Cilt / Sayfa63 · 213-225
Scopus ID2-s2.0-84956919942
Erişim🔓 Açık Erişim
Özet
Approach of pulmonologists in turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation use in acute respiratory failure Introduction: Noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) has been increasingly used worldwide for acute respiratory failure (ARF), especially in patients with chronic lung disorders. We aimed to define the approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to NIV use for ARF management. Materials and Methods: A 38-question survey, developed and tested by authors, was distributed by e-mail to a total of 2.205 pulmonologists in Turkey. Results: Response rate was 27% (n= 596). Seventy-one percent of responders were practicing NIV in clinic. NIV use was found to be associated with responder’s academic title, age, duration of medical license, type of physician’s hospital and its region, patient load, NIV experience during residency, and duration of NIV and intensive care unit (ICU) experience (p< 0.001). Based on sub-group analysis of responders using NIV, median number of NIV patients followed-up per week was 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 2-6]. Most of the NIV users reported employment of wards (90%) and/or ICUs (86%) to follow-up patients, while 8.4% of the responders were applying NIV only in ICU’s. Chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) (99.5%), obesity hypoventilation syndrome (93.7%) and restrictive lung disease (89.4%) were the most common indications. Majority of NIV users (87%) were applying NIV to > 60% of patients with COPD, and success rate in COPD was reported as over 60% by 93% of users. Oronasal mask (median and IQR 90, 80-100%, respectively) and home care NIV ventilators (median and IQR 50, 10-85%, respectively) were the most commonly utilized equipment. Conclusion: NIV use in ARF varies based on hospital type, region and, especially, experience of the physician. Although consistent with guidelines and general practice, NIV use can still be improved and increased.
Yazarlar (18)
1
Aylin Özsancak Uğurlu
2
Begüm Ergan
ORCID: 0000-0003-2920-9214
3
Huriye Berk Takir
4
Erdal İn
5
Ezgi Özyılmaz
ORCID: 0000-0002-4535-705X
6
Özlem Ertan Edipoğlu
7
Eylem Acartürk
8
Ege Güleç Balbay
9
Aslı Görek Dilektaşlı
10
Tülay Kivanç
11
Pervin Korkmaz Ekren
12
Sevinç Sarinç Ulaşli
13
Ilgaz Doğrul
14
Elif Yilmazel Ucar
15
Şehnaz Olgun
16
Özkan Devran
17
Recai Ergün
18
Zuhal Karakurt
Anahtar Kelimeler
Acute respiratory failure
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
General wards
Intensive care unit
Noninvasive ventilation
Survey
Kurumlar
Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi
Afyonkarahisar Turkey
Ahi Evren Chest Cardiovascular Surgery Education and Research Hospital
Turkey
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University
Ankara Turkey
Atatürk Üniversitesi
Erzurum Turkey
Başkent Üniversitesi
Ankara Turkey
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi
Bursa Turkey
Çukurova Üniversitesi
Adana Turkey
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi
Izmir Turkey
Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital
Izmir Türkiye
Düzce Üniversitesi
Duzce Turkey
Ege Üniversitesi
Izmir Turkey
Firat Üniversitesi
Elazig Turkey
Marmara Üniversitesi
Istanbul Turkey
Sureyyapasa Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul Turkey
Metrikler
2
Atıf
18
Yazar
6
Anahtar Kelime