Scopus
🔓 Açık Erişim YÖKSİS Eşleşti
Approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation use at home for chronic respiratory failure
Tuberkuloz ve Toraks · Ocak 2016
YÖKSİS Kayıtları
Approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation use at home for chronic respiratory failure
Tuberkuloz ve Toraks · 2016 TR DİZİN
PROFESÖR RECAİ ERGÜN →
Makale Bilgileri
DergiTuberkuloz ve Toraks
Yayın TarihiOcak 2016
Cilt / Sayfa64 · 1-8
Scopus ID2-s2.0-84969256645
Erişim🔓 Açık Erişim
Özet
Introduction: To define approach of pulmonologists in Turkey to noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) use for chronic respiratory failure (CRF), the most currently applied technique for home mechanical ventilation. Patients and Methods: A 38-question survey, developed and tested by the authors, was distributed throughout Turkey to 2205 pulmonologists by e-mail. Results: Twenty-seven percent of the pulmonologists responded (n=596). Domiciliary NIV was reported to be prescribed by 340 physicians [57.1% of all responders and 81% of pulmonologists practicing NIV at clinical practice (n= 420)]. NIV prescription was associated with physician’s title, type of hospital, duration of medical license, total number of patients treated with NIV during residency and current number of patients treated with NIV per week (p< 0.05). Main estimated indications were listed as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (median, 25-75 percentile of the prescriptions: 75%, 60-85), obesity hypoventilation syndrome (10%, 2-15), overlap syndrome (10%, 0-20) and restrictive lung disease (5%, 2-10). For utilization of NIV at home, Bilevel positive airway pressure-spontaneous mode (40%, 0-80) and oronasal mask (90%, 60-100) were stated as the most frequently recommended mode and interface, respectively. Pressure settings were most often titrated based on arterial blood gas findings (79.2%). Humidifier was stated not to be prescribed by approximately half of the physicians recommending domicilliary NIV, and the main reason for this (59.2%) was being un-refundable by social security foundation. Conclusion: There is a wide variation in Turkey for prescription of NIV, which is supposed to improve clinical course of patients with CRF. Further studies are required to determine the possible causes of these differences, frequency of use and patient outcomes in this setting.
Yazarlar (18)
1
Aylin Özsancak Uğurlu
2
Huriye Berk Takir
3
Begüm Ergan
ORCID: 0000-0003-2920-9214
4
Erdal İn
5
Ezgi Özyılmaz
ORCID: 0000-0002-4535-705X
6
Özlem Ertan Edipoğlu
7
Eylem Acartürk
8
Ege Güleç Balbay
9
Aslı Görek Dilektaşlı
10
Tülay Kivanç
11
Pervin Korkmaz Ekren
12
Sevinç Sarinç Ulaşli
13
Ilgaz Doğrul
14
Elif Yilmazel Ucar
15
Şehnaz Olgun
16
Özkan Devran
17
Recai Ergün
18
Zuhal Karakurt
Anahtar Kelimeler
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Chronic respiratory failure
Noninvasive ventilation
Survey
Kurumlar
Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi
Afyonkarahisar Turkey
Ahi Evren Chest Cardiovascular Surgery Education and Research Hospital
Turkey
Atatürk Üniversitesi
Erzurum Turkey
Başkent Üniversitesi
Ankara Turkey
Baskent Üniversitesi, Ankara Hastanesi
Ankara Türkiye
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi
Bursa Turkey
Çukurova Üniversitesi
Adana Turkey
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi
Izmir Turkey
Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital
Izmir Türkiye
Düzce Üniversitesi
Duzce Turkey
Ege Üniversitesi
Izmir Turkey
Firat Üniversitesi
Elazig Turkey
Marmara Üniversitesi
Istanbul Turkey
Sureyyapasa Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul Turkey
T. C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Eğitim ve Araştirma Hastanesi
Ankara Turkey
Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul Turkey
Metrikler
3
Atıf
18
Yazar
4
Anahtar Kelime