Scopus
🔓 Açık Erişim YÖKSİS DOI Eşleşti
SJR Q3
The Problem of Connecting Polytheism to Allah’s Wish as the Reason for Denial of the Polytheists in Tafsīrs
Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi · Ocak 2021
YÖKSİS Kayıtları
Tefsirlerde Müşriklerin İnkâr Sebebi Olarak Şirki Allah'ın Meşietine Bağlama Sorunsalı
Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi · 2021 ESCI
Prof. Dr. MUHAMMED ERSÖZ →
YÖKSİS Kayıtları — ISSN Eşleşmesi
Kur’an’da Yer Alan ‘Şeytan’ın Adımlarını İzlemeyin’ İfadesinin Anlam ve Yorumu Üzerine
2017 ISSN: 2528-9861 ESCI
Prof. Dr. MUHAMMED ERSÖZ →
Sahâbî Urve b. Mes‘ûd es-Sekafî’nin Hayatı
2020 ISSN: 2528-9861 Art Index (Art Research Database, EBSCO)
Prof. Dr. MİTHAT ESER →
Muğâmeratu Rivâye Tahavvele fîhâ en-Na'lü ile'l-Bağl fî Siyâkı't-Tahlîk ve Nakdi'l-Metn
2021 ISSN: 2528-9861 Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
Prof. Dr. YUSUF ACAR →
Tefsirlerde Müşriklerin İnkâr Sebebi Olarak Şirki Allah'ın Meşietine Bağlama Sorunsalı
2021 ISSN: 2528-9861 ESCI
Prof. Dr. MUHAMMED ERSÖZ →
İbn Sînâ’nın eş-Şifâ Metafizik 1/8’de Sofistlerle Tartışma ve Dış Karşısında Zihnin Araçsallaşması
2022 ISSN: 2528-9861 ESCI
Prof. Dr. ÖMER ALİ YILDIRIM →
A Decoration Technique Featured in 18th Century Turkish Bindings: Yekşah
2022 ISSN: 2528-9861 Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
Doç. Dr. FATMA ŞEYMA BOYDAK →
Tefsirlerde Amellerin Karşılığının On Kat Verilmesi: Tematik ve Problematik Bir İnceleme
2022 ISSN: 2528-9861 ESCI
Prof. Dr. MUHAMMED ERSÖZ →
Mevlânâ’nın Dîvân-ı Kebîr’inde İktibas ve Telmih Yoluyla Yer Alan Rivayetler
2022 ISSN: 2528-9861 ESCI
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi MUSTAFA YÜCEER →
İslam Hukuku ve Antik İbrani Hukukunda Yargıçlık
2022 ISSN: 2528-9861 ESCI
Doç. Dr. MELİKŞAH AYDIN →
Tümevarım Metodu Açısından en-Nahvu’l-Vâdıh ve el-Kavâ'idu’l-Arabiyyetu’l-Muyessere Adlı Arapça Dilbilgisi Kitaplarının İncelenmesi: Nitel Bir Araştırma
2022 ISSN: 2528-9861 Scopus, ESCI
Doç. Dr. MESUT KÖKSOY →
İslami İlimler Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Akademik Motivasyonları ve Algıladıkları Okul İklimi İlişkisi (Selçuk Üniversitesi İslami İlimler Fakültesi Örneği)
2022 ISSN: 2528-9861 ESCI
Prof. Dr. SÜMEYRA BİLECİK KARACAN →
Kur'an'daki 'İn küntüm' İfadesinin Gramatik ve Problematik Yorumları Üzerine Bir İnceleme
2023 ISSN: 2528-9861 ESCI
Doç. Dr. SÜLEYMAN NAROL →
V-r-d Fiilinin Semantik Analizi Bağlamında “Sizden Herkes Cehenneme Uğrayacaktır” Ayetinin Değerlendirilmesi
2023 ISSN: 2528-9861 ESCI
Prof. Dr. MUHAMMED ERSÖZ →
“Dünya Müminin Zindanı, Kâfirin Cennetidir” Rivayetinin Analizi ve Metaforik Bir Yorum Denemesi
2024 ISSN: 2528-9861 Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi FURKAN ÇAKIR →
Fıkhî Açıdan Altın ve Gümüş Dışındaki Madenlerin ve Kıymetli Taşların Ziynet Amaçlı Kullanımı
2025 ISSN: 2528-9861 ESCI
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi SÜLEYMAN ŞAHİN →
Makale Bilgileri
ISSN25289861
Yayın TarihiOcak 2021
Cilt / Sayfa25 · 93-113
Scopus ID2-s2.0-85108720659
Erişim🔓 Açık Erişim
Özet
In the Qurʾān, it is mentioned that those who disbelieve insist on not believing by putting forward various excuses. One of them is that deniers attribute polytheism to Allah’s wish. When those who disbelieve are asked why they do not believe, they argue that they cannot deny unless Allah wills. On the other hand, expressions in line with the words spoken by the polytheists in the Qurʾān are also attributed to Allah. Such a paradoxical appearance between the verses requires a detailed examination of the subject. In this study, the reasons for using these expressions by the deniers and the historical contexts of the verses will be examined. In addition, we will talk about the discussion of whether the expressions that bind polytheism to the wish of God are absolutely correct, since the subject is related to the wish. Because the interpretation of the verses varies according to both views. In addition to this, whether the deniers are sincere in these words is an element that affects the interpretation. Ahl al-Sunna scholars argue that this proposition is absolutely correct and that the deniers say this sentence with a mocking attitude. On the other hand, Muʿtazilī scholars are of the opinion that the proposition is absolutely wrong and that the deniers say this word with conviction. In addition, while Muʿtazilī scholars think that the nature of the Allah’s wish in both verses is different; Ahl Sunna scholars think that both are the same. Although it seems at first glance that the disbelievers attribute their denial to the legacy of Allah is an attitude that mocks them and believes that Allah is pleased with them, in reality, this is because they deny fate and turn to coercion and do not believe in prophethood and the Hereafter. Because, saying “If Allah willed, we would not associate” is based on the conviction that Allah gave consent to this belief they inherited from their ancestors and left them in accordance with their current beliefs. Devotion to ancestors is not necessarily a bad thing. However, if loyalty to ancestors is through prophethood, it leads to a true faith and ensures that faith is transferred to the next generations in a healthy way. On the other hand, if traditional practices in the name of religion turn into a practice that is against the spirit of the religion after a while, devotion to ancestors becomes an element that leads to denial. The fact that their ancestors lived a very prosperous life in the world even though they also had this belief reveals that they did not believe in the hereafter. Because, according to their opinion, if their ancestors had not been on the right path, God should have punished them in this world. Another reason why they attribute their denial to the legacy of Allah is their lack of belief in prophethood. Because, according to them, prophethood does not have an effect, nor it is necessary, for their faith, which depends only on the legacy of Allah. The most important factor that determines whether the propositions in the verses we examined are correct is the context of the sentence and the intention of the people using the proposition. In other words, the meaning and value of attributing denial to Allah’s wish differs according to the addressee. Because one can mean the falsehood with a true word. The same expression used in different contexts used for this may also be false, due to the difference in context and purpose. As pointed out in verse 148 of Surat al-An’am, a person who has the ability and power to believe, abandon polytheism and rebellion, ignoring this opportunity and power given by Allah and implying that he is pleased with a deed that Allah is not pleased with like idolatry. “If Allah willed, we would not associate idolatry” is a false sentence and false claim that is expressed in the verse. On the other hand, as pointed out in verse 107 of the Surat al-An’am and verse 99 of Surat Yunus, our Prophet who is desperate in the current situation and who has an extreme sense of responsibility because they do not believe, consoled our Prophet that his only duty was to convey the truth to the deniers with the statement “If Allah so willed, they would not have converted to Islam” and “If Allah willed, all those on earth would have believed,” indicating that he allowed them to practice idolatry as a requirement of the test and that he did not force people to believe, in order to state that he is not a guardian and that he should not force them to believe. Therefore, each different situation points to a different dimension of the truth about God’s legitimacy.
Yazarlar (1)
1
Muhammed Ersöz
ORCID: 0000-0002-7693-7428
Anahtar Kelimeler
Belief
Denial
Qurʾān
Tafsīr
Wish
Kurumlar
Selçuk Üniversitesi
Selçuklu Turkey
Scimago Dergi (ISSN Eşleşmesi)
Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi
Q3
OA
SJR Skoru0,130
H-Index6
YayıncıCumhuriyet University
ÜlkeTurkey
Philosophy (Q3)
Religious Studies (Q3)
Social Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q4)