CANLI
Yükleniyor Veriler getiriliyor…
/ Makaleler / Scopus Detay
Scopus 🔓 Açık Erişim YÖKSİS Eşleşti

Is there a difference between two different skin disinfection methods in cardiac surgery in terms of isolated pathogens?

Journal of Infection in Developing Countries · Haziran 2020

YÖKSİS DOI Eşleşmesi Bulundu

Bu Scopus makalesi YÖKSİS veritabanında da kayıtlı. Aşağıda YÖKSİS verilerini görebilirsiniz.

YÖKSİS Kayıtları
Is there a difference between two different skin disinfection methods in cardiac surgery in terms of isolated pathogens?
JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES · 2020 SCI-Expanded
DOÇENT ATİLLA ORHAN →
Is there a difference between two different skin disinfection methods in cardiac surgery in terms of isolated pathogens?
The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries · 2020 SCI-Expanded
DOÇENT ATİLLA ORHAN →

Makale Bilgileri

DergiJournal of Infection in Developing Countries
Yayın TarihiHaziran 2020
Cilt / Sayfa14 · 647-653
Erişim🔓 Açık Erişim
Özet Introduction: In this study, our aim was to prospectively compare the different methods of patient disinfections with scrubbing + iodine + alcohol, and the povidone iodine disinfection method, which can be described as classical, in terms of the pathogens isolated on skin and during early postoperative complications. Methodology: Eighty patients undergoing a coronary artery bypass operation were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 48) patients who underwent scrub, iodine, followed by skin disinfection with alcohol, and group 2 (n = 32) who were treated with povidone iodine three times. The samples were immediately sent to the microbiology laboratory. Specimens from the wounds were incubated under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and isolates were identified using standard microbiological techniques. Results: In samples taken after disinfection in group 1, significantly less reproduction was observed compared to group 2 (p = 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two groups except for pleural effusion (p = 0.040). S. epidermidis was the most frequently isolated pathogen in both groups. Conclusion: We did not find a study which compares scrub + alcohol + iodine and povidone iodine in our literature review. We think that our study is original in this respect. We can conclude that skin disinfection with scrub + alcohol + iodine was superior to using only povidone iodine in terms of the pathogens isolated afterwards from the wound.

Yazarlar (4)

1
Murat Gönday
2
Atilla Orhan
ORCID: 0000-0003-0110-3290
3
Hale Turan
4
M. K. Korez
ORCID: 0000-0001-9524-6115

Anahtar Kelimeler

Alcohol Cardiac surgery Povidone iodine Wound infection

Kurumlar

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
Afyonkarahisar Turkey
Başkent Üniversitesi
Ankara Turkey
Farabi Hospital
Konya Turkey
Selçuk Üniversitesi
Selçuklu Turkey

Metrikler

1
Atıf
4
Yazar
4
Anahtar Kelime

Sistemimizdeki Yazarlar