The objective of this study was to assess the effect of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) treatment before sponge insertion and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration in ewes which were either pregnant or non-pregnant during the previous breeding season. In the study, 375 (3–6-year-old) Kangal-Akkaraman ewes that conceived or did not conceive in the preceding breeding season, and 36 rams (3–6-year-old) were used. The sheep were randomly divided into 5 equal groups. Blood samples were taken before stimulation (day −4), the day stimulation was initiated (day 0), after stimulation (day 9), on the mating day (days 11–12). AMH concentrations were measured in the samples taken on − 4th day. As a conventional method, a sponge containing 20 mg of flugeston acetate (Chronogest® CR, MSD, Turkey) was placed intravaginally (day 0) into to study ewes. The ewes were intramuscularly administered 131.5 µg prostaglandin F2α (Estrumate, MSD, Turkey) and 600 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (Chronogest® PMSG 6000, MSD, Turkey) simultaneously with sponge removal 9 days after insertion. No other treatment was applied to group 5 which served as control. Ewes in groups 1, 2, and 3 received an intramuscular injection of GnRH (4.2 µg of Buserelin acetate, Receptal, MSD, Turkey) at the time of insertion of progesterone sponge. GnRH or 600 IU hCG (Chorulon®, MSD, UK) was administered 4 days prior to sponge insertion for the ewes in the groups 2, and 3, respectively. As for the group 5 group, hCG (instead of GnRH) was administered to the ewes at the beginning of the progesterone treatment. Ewes in estrus were detected with a teaser ram and taken into a different pen with rams. Transrectal ultrasonography (Mindray DP50/Vet/US, rectal probe) was achieved during days the 30–35 following mating. Transabdominal ultrasonography was achieved during days 60–65 to detect late embryonic and early fetal death. The estrus rate was 71.19 % out of breeding season for all ewes. The pregnancy rate on day 30 post-mating was 32 % in the control group and was 31.00 %. No significant differences were observed between groups for pregnancy rates on day 30. The mean pregnancy rate in sheep that conceived and did not conceived in the preceding breeding season of the study was 32.03 % and 32.06 % respectively (P > 0.05). After treatments, AMH concentrations in non-pregnant were significantly higher than pregnant ewes (P < 0.005). In conclusion, although the AMH concentration is significantly higher in non-pregnant ewes, the AMH concentration may not be a suitable biomarker to predict induction success outside breeding season. Progesterone-based protocols may achieve an acceptable reproductive outcome in lactating ewes and the ones which experienced infertility.